Originally published on FOXSports.com.
Difficult decisions always have consequences.
For Steve Pederson the consequences of his most difficult decision as
In 2003, less than a year after taking the AD job at
For anyone who watched the Cornhuskers surrender 40-plus points in four of their past five games, mediocre seemed generous.
Some were picking
While those questions might temporarily be blown off in the jet wash of a statewide sigh of relief, they’re far from gone and that still spells bad news for Bill Callahan.
When Callahan was hired in 2004—following an embarrassing search that saw a number of candidates turn down the job—he flipped the culture of
As the records for consecutive winning seasons and bowl appearances fell in his first 5-6 season,
The 2007 Blackshirts defense has been historically bad, allowing 40 or more points more times this season than they did in all of the 1970s and ‘80s combined.
Is any of that going to change with the Pederson firing? That doesn’t seem likely. The road from the front office to the field is often a one way street so don’t count on much renewed fire between the lines. But the move by Perlman wasn’t about immediate results, it was about the future.
Exactly what that future will be still remains to be seen. Before the firing was even announced, rumors were swirling that Tom Osborne would be the man to succeed Pederson in the interim as athletic director. Turner Gill, the former Husker great and architect behind a minor MAC uprising at
What we do know is this:
The thing that scared
In the face of growing dissent
A mere four years removed from their last upheaval, it’s fair to question whether or not this is a sign of progress or just another step in the downward spiral of hiring and firing, but Nebraska has one valuable resource on their side should they go looking for only their fifth head coach in the past 47 years: experience.
They’ve been there, and failed, before.
No comments:
Post a Comment